كتاب أثر اختلاف الأسانيد والمتون في اختلاف الفقهاء

الخاتمة في خلاصة نتائج البحث - ص: 491

Abstract

The science of honorable Hadith, is one of the noblest Al-Shareha sciences, rather it is the noblest one at all after the study of the Holy Quran which is the root of the right way. Thus we find the mohdtheen waste their ages in the following Hadith ways and criticizing as well as studying. Till, they exaggerate to the extent in searching, criticizing and testing the different sources its ways and illness. Thus the scientific knowledge of Hadith illness is the major part and its field which the mohdtheen skills and criticism are shown in.

That is why Hadith science has strong correlation with the Islamic Philology, because we find a greater part of Philology come from Hadith that is why Hadith is one of the main sources to the Islamic Philology. It is known that there are many differences in Hadith, and these differences are divided into the source and the body, and some of them are taken part between the body and the source. These differences have great role in the difference of Philologist. Thus I have the motive to collect these differences and make indexes and arranging with the scientific rule to every type of these differences, then I mention the arbitrator summary of Hadith after making reference to the savant. Afterwards I remember what you are arranged on these differences from difference in the standpoints of the jurists and their views a result of this new difference.

From here combining Hadith science with the science of religious law arrived, and I gave little this binding by that you were remembered with a suitable detailing, a sample or more clearing an egoistic of this difference is in the difference of the jurists.

Thus, the thesis falls into four chapters:

The thesis is published with an introduction to show the